The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled Monday that the National Football
League can ban off-duty officers from bringing guns into stadiums on
game day. The story from the Strib is here.
"The dispute began in February 2014, when two local law enforcement
groups sued the NFL, saying they believe officers have the right to
carry and that the public expects them to always be on duty, even at a
sporting event."
O.K., if that's true, and maybe it is, doesn't that lead to some other consequences? For instance, if off-duty cops are expected to be armed, shouldn't they also be expected to be sober at all times? In fact, shouldn't any police officer be completely alcohol-free 24/7, 365 days a year? After all, they have access to firearms and high-powered automobiles at all times. Logically, cops should be the subjects of random testing for drugs and alcohol by independent agencies. Those that test positive should then be dismissed from employment. What's scarier than a drunk cop with a gun?
Additionally, it seems that, at least in some jurisdictions, retired cops are able to carry concealed weapons and take part in police activity, like this one did. Other retired cops use their guns for less legitimate purposes, like this guy.
No comments:
Post a Comment