“There is no necessary and direct connection between the value of a good
and whether, or in what quantities, labor and other goods of higher
order were applied to its production. A non-economic good (a quantity of
timber in a virgin forest, for example) does not attain value for men
since large quantities of labor or other economic goods were not applied
to its production. Whether a diamond was found accidentally or was
obtained from a diamond pit with the employment of a thousand days of
labor is completely irrelevant for its value. In general, no one in
practical life asks for the history of the origin of a good in
estimating its value, but considers solely the services that the good
will render him and which he would have to forgo if he did not have it
at his command…The quantities of labor or of other means of production
applied to its production cannot, therefore, be the determining factor
in the value of a good. Comparison of the value of a good with the value
of the means of production employed in its production does, of course,
show whether and to what extent its production, an act of past human
activity, was appropriate or economic. But the quantities of goods
employed in the production of a good have neither a necessary nor a
directly determining influence on its value.”
No comments:
Post a Comment