Monday, February 19, 2018

Jasper Johns Fiesta

Image result for Newsweek Jasper Johns cover
Cover of the October 24, 1977 issue of Newsweek featuring pop art icon Jasper Johns. The magazine wrote letters to subscribers stating that its article on Johns had produced more negative feedback than any other article they had ever published.

The Broad Museum in downtown Los Angeles, CA is exhibiting a selection of more than 120 works in various media by Jasper Johns, as presented by the museum's web page.



John's "Flag", painted in 1967.

Image result for Jasper Johns Map, 1961

A loving review of the exhibition by New York artist Peter Plagens was published in the Wall Street Journal. One paragraph:

"The formidable catalog for the formidable exhibition "Jasper Johns: 'Something Resembling Truth," at the Broad museum, calls the artist the "painterly champion of fundamentally conceptual practices." He could also conceivably be called the conceptual champion of fundamentally painterly practices, which might make him the artistic equivalent of the world's shortest giant or tallest dwarf.It would if Mr. Johns (b. 1930) didn't make such a masterly art that combines the best of both head and hand."

 Image result for Peter Plagens
A painting by Peter Plagens. One might easily come to the conclusion that he and Mr. Johns are members of the same artistic brotherhood.

Saturday, February 17, 2018

Do You Know These People?



MIKHAIL IVANOVICH BYSTROV
 MIKHAIL LEONIDOVICH BURCHIK
ALEKSANDRA YURYEVNA KRYLOVA
ANNA VLADISLAVOVNA BOGACHEVA
SERGEY PAVLOVICH POLOZOV
MARIA ANATOLYEVNA BOVDA
ROBERT SERGEYEVICH BOVDA
 DZHEYKHUN NASIMI OGLY ASLANOV
VADIM VLADIMIROVICH PODKOPAEV
GLEB IGOREVICH VASILCHENKO
IRINA VIKTOROVNA KAVERZINA
VLADIMIR VENKOV
YEVGENIY VIKTOROVICH PRIGOZHIN

These are the Russians that have been indicted by a US grand jury hearing evidence from US Special Counsel Robert Mueller in regard to the illegal influence they might have had on the US presidential election. None of these people are in US custody. Presumably US Marshals will be dispatched to Russia with instructions to slap some handcuffs on them and drag them back to the land of liberty.

Many photos are available of the craggy Robert Mueller, who appears to be a relative of John Kerry, but we have none of the assorted Russkie individuals that managed to steal the presidency from the beloved Mrs. Bill Clinton.

 In the absence of photographic evidence to their identities it might be possible for the US government to hire actors with Russian accents, prosecute and try them, then sentence them to prison for inflicting Donald Trump upon the nation. Later on, they could be secretly released with generous pensions or even well-paid positions in the FBI itself. Such things have happened in the past. 

Update from the AP: March 4, 2018


WASHINGTON (AP) — Russia will "never" extradite any of the 13 Russians indicted by the United States for election-meddling, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, even as he insisted they didn't act on behalf of his government.
Putin's comments in an NBC News interview airing Sunday illustrated the long odds that the Russian operatives will ever appear in U.S. court to answer charges of running a massive, secret social media trolling and targeted messaging operation to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. The United States has no extradition treaty with Moscow and can't compel it to hand over citizens, and a provision in Russia's constitution prohibits extraditing its citizens to foreign countries.
"Never. Never. Russia does not extradite its citizens to anyone," Putin said.
Even if the Russians never face justice in the United States, the sweeping indictment served the added purpose of increasing the public's awareness about the elaborate foreign campaign to meddle in American democracy, legal experts have said. For years, the Justice Department has supported indicting foreigners in absentia as a way to shame them and make it harder for them to travel abroad.
The detailed, 37-page indictment from special counsel Robert Mueller last month alleges Russian operatives working for the Internet Research Agency used fake social media accounts and on-the-ground political organizing to exacerbate divisive political issues in the U.S. Posing as American activists, the operatives tried to conceal the effort's Russian roots by purchasing space on U.S. computer servers and using U.S. email providers.
Yet Putin argued his government has little to answer for until the U.S. provides "some materials, specifics and data." He said Russia would be "prepared to look at them and talk about it," while repeating his government's insistence that it had no role in directing the operatives to act against the United States.
"I know that they do not represent the Russian state, the Russian authorities," Putin said. "What they did specifically, I have no idea."

Sunday, February 11, 2018

Super Bowl LII Opportunity Cost $9 Billion

Since the most promoted and observed sporting event in the US is held on a late afternoon Sunday, most football fans probably aren't ditching other duties in order to watch it on television. It is, however, the television program that entices the largest audience of the year.

The 2018 Super Bowl LII, held in Minneapolis, MN on February 4, didn't set any viewer records but still managed to lure an audience of 103.4 million, according to the Nielsen people that determine television ratings.

Advertising on the 3 hour and 46 minute production cost a total of 414 million dollars. The commercials and other scenes not related to the actual game itself took up 49 minutes and 35 seconds of the program, 22% of the total broadcast time.

On the basis of these numbers, and the average American hourly wage, we can speculate that in order to watch this classic of athletic excellence viewers willingly gave up on an income of a little less than $9 billion. That represents only money that wasn't made. It doesn't include the cost of beer, chips, guacamole and chicken wings. Expenditures unrelated to opportunity cost, law enforcement overtime and trash clean-up, are not included.

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Photographs of Evil People

This article in the St. Paul Pioneer Press reveals that a senior investigator of Minnesota's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension used his status to coerce sex from a paid informant and that in 2015 the state paid $117,500 to settle the affair with the offended lady.


Adam Castilleja

The individual involved, Senior Special Agent Adam Castilleja, was suspended for 30 days and assigned to other duties but remains employed at the state's most important law enforcement agency, roughly the Gopher State version of the Texas Rangers.

Amazing as that may be, what's even more amazing is that a media institution with a history of publishing significant news for 168 years couldn't come up with a photograph of this Adam Castilleja. While photographs of the easily recognized, Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, Mrs. Bill Clinton, Governor Mark Dayton, etc. are daily sprinkled through the pages of the capital city's news and mug shots of unconvicted miscreants are generally seen, there's no likeness of a person so sleazy that no ordinary person would wish to be in the same auditorium with him. This is a normal operating procedure for a newspaper that defends the felonious elements of law enforcement no matter what the circumstances. It demonstrates not only the power of law enforcement over the criminal portion of society but also the media whose duty is to inform and enlighten that supposedly democratic society.

Maybe we should be happy to receive any information at all about this whole affair. Maybe there's some regulation that forbids the publishing of photographs of disgraced public employees. Even so, let's remember that video surveillance cameras and their still counterparts aren't installed for artistic purposes. Official video recording and photos are used primarily for identification purposes. The idea that the public shouldn't have easy access to the physical identification of its own employees is a feature of a secret police in a police state.

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Trump's Wall

Building a wall along a border isn't a new idea. In some cases, its construction may have not only prevented the passage of people from one place to another, but also provided a psuedo-economic boost to activity. It seems unlikely, however, that laborers employed in wall construction in antiquity received payment. They were more likely to be slaves or soldiers.

The most famous of walls is, of course, the Great Wall of China. Begun in the 7th century BC and lengthened and maintained since, the Chinese version of immigrant control and defense ultimately extended to 3889 miles of actual wall itself and remains one of the architectural wonders of the world. Its efficiency in preserving the cultural integrity of its makers is open to question.

The Great Wall of China

Roman emperor Hadrian had problems with Scots and Picts raiding the province of Britannia in the second century AD. In 122 the Roman army began building a wall that stretched 73 miles across northern Britain and came to define the border for hundreds of years. Hadrian's successor, Antonine Pius built another, less impressive fortification, further north which was used by the Romans at different times in following years. In the early fifth century the troublesome province was abandoned as the empire went into decline. Parts of the wall were used as building materials.

Image result for Hadrian's wall
Hadrian's Wall

In 1961 the East German's began building the " Antifascistischer Schutzwall" or "antifascist bulwark", to separate the Allied area of West Berlin from the rest of Communist East Germany. A heavily fortified wall of concrete and barbed wire guarded by trigger-happy soldiers, the wall became a symbol of the ideological conflict between the socialist east and capitalist west. In 1989 Hungary pulled the plug on its 150 mile electrified fence between it and Austria. This allowed thousands of East German tourists to escape to Austria and then travel on to West Germany. The Berlin Wall could no longer prevent Commie Germans from making their way to the West. Later that year the East Germans quit regulating the  Berlin border crossings and in November destruction of the wall began.
 Image result for The berlin wall

The Berlin Wall begins to come down.

There are actual plans and preparations being made for the construction of a physical barrier between the US and Mexico. Evidently US authority figures are listening to the complaints of citizens who are objecting to the presence in the US of undocumented aliens from countries south of the US. In that the Mexican border is 1,951 miles long, much of it in remote, sparsely populated desert, some of it running through the middle of big, divided cities, erecting an effective barrier looks to be a huge project.
 

San Diego, CA on the left, Tijuana, Baja California on the right. (Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Gordon Hyde)
Mock-ups of possible wall configurations have been constructed in an attempt to determine the most cost-effective form to adopt for the new barrier. "Estimates range from as low as $8 billion to as much as $67 billion or more, depending on whom you ask and the number of miles of wall that get built. Based on Trump’s 2017 budget request for $2.6 billion to plan, design and build 75 miles of wall, Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill’s office estimated the per-mile cost would be about $37 million, or nearly $67 billion for the entire 2,000-mile border. Congressional Republicans have said they expect a wall to cost from $12 billion to $15 billion, based on the cost to rebuild existing border fencing covering a third of that distance. These projections, however, don’t include the cost of land acquisition. Two-thirds of the land is private or state-owned, much of it in Texas. The Trump administration could seek to use eminent domain to seize land needed for a border barrier, as well as support roads and other infrastructure, though it would likely face costly legal challenges that could delay construction for years."(Fortune.com)

 the border wall prototypes
Proposed wall configurations that have been erected near San Diego.

Little consideration seems to have been given to the fact that the southern reaches of the US also includes over 3051 miles of coastline.  In the past these areas have been the focus of the smuggling of humans, drugs, liquor and other banned items, as they are even today. A wall across the southern US land border will complicate illegal immigration (as it will international retail business and tourism) making it likely that the most determined invaders will take to the sea, as no doubt many do now. Thousands of disgruntled Cubans have made their way across the Gulf of Mexico to a new life in Florida.

Will there be a movement to erect barriers along the Florida, California and Texas coasts to keep non-citizens away? It might be possible to construct a "fortress America" on the Florida beaches but would property owners accept this? Perhaps the US Coast Guard, already tasked with intercepting smugglers, is ready for an expanded role protecting the American coastline from an increase in illegal immigrants in addition to narcotics smugglers.

 
Beach at  South Padre Island, Texas, courtesy of TripAdvisor

An attractive variation of the walls considered for stemming the tide of illegal entry to the US could only increase the majesty of the Texas oceanfront.

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Women Fans in Saudi Arabia

The media is finding it noteworthy that probable heir to the Saudi throne, Prince Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, is prodding the desert kingdom into social modernity by expanding the opportunities for women. They are now allowed to drive automobiles, travel without the escort of a male relative and engage in other public activities formerly forbidden to them. One of these is activities is attending sporting events, as this article describes. How wonderful that Arab women are now able to partake of the masculine experience that is sports appreciation.

Actually, only a few years ago, women at sporting events was unusual almost everywhere, even in the most socially advanced societies. No English lady would be seen at a Premier League football match. Try counting the number of females visible in this photograph of a crowd at a world series baseball game at Yankee Stadium in 1928.

 Image result for 1928 world series


Now, of course, women make up a significant portion of the spectators at most sports events. Is this evidence of social progress? Maybe not.

Sports management, the people that figure out how to make sports as profitable as possible, came to realize that there was a big pool of potential spectators home darning socks and filling coloring books while their adult male relatives were at the stadium. Why not make baseball, football, etc. a "family experience"? This they did, with special family sections, family ticket offers and ancillary entertainment geared to women and children not completely mesmerized by the game on the field itself. The children enjoy the opportunity to play grab ass with other kids and stuff their faces with expensive bratwurst and ice cream. Mommy orders new lingerie on her smart phone, confident that she can keep Daddy from stopping off at the saloon on the way home and make it to work on time the next day. Family attendance at sporting extravaganzas has nothing to do with social progress. It's strictly  business.

For most women and kids, and even many males, who don't know an RBI from a sacrifice fly, attendance at a game isn't an opportunity to observe a contest between exceptional athletes. It's instead a chance to be in group of people with a similar desire, that the home team vanquish the foreign rivals. The details are unimportant.

Saturday, January 13, 2018

The Chances of Being Killed At Work

fatalities.PNG
It should also be noted that policing is not among the deadliest professions, and is not in the top ten according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Given that there are more than 900,000 sworn officers, and with 128 fatalities (including accidents) reported in 2017, that brings the fatality rate to under 15 per 100,000. In other words, a job in "grounds maintenance" is more risky than being a police officer. (Thanks to the Mises Institute.)